Week 12 · 14 min

Week 12: The Commission

Giving a reason for the hope

See it

Slide decks that belong with this page.

Slide deck · 11 slidesThe commission: giving a reason for the hope

Week 12: The Commission – Giving a Reason for the Hope

Main Teaching

Welcome to the final week of "Foundations of Hope. " Over the past eleven weeks, we've embarked on a transformative journey, equipping ourselves with the tools to provide a reasoned defense for the hope we have in Christ, as instructed by the Apostle Peter: "Always be prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect" (1 Peter 3:15, ESV).

We've explored the philosophical foundations for God's existence, the historical reliability of the New Testament, the Minimal Facts surrounding the resurrection, corroborating artifacts like the Shroud of Turin and Sudarium of Oviedo, and the internal witness of Scripture's unity. This course has been a safe space for questions and doubts, an invitation to love God with all your mind (Matthew 22:37). Now, in Week 12, we bring everything together in "The Commission. " Our focus shifts from accumulating knowledge to applying wisdom—translating what we've learned into actionable, personal practice. The goal is not intellectual mastery alone but becoming effective ambassadors for Christ, able to synthesize these arguments into a natural, compelling narrative that resonates with others. We'll learn how to craft our own personal apologetic story, blending evidence with testimony, and how to share it in ways that are relational, authentic, and impactful. This isn't about winning debates but clearing paths for the Gospel, as Paul did in Athens (Acts 17), meeting people where they are. Structured into four parts, we'll review the journey, guide you in building your story, provide practical sharing tips, and address common objections with gentle responses. By the end, you'll not only have a stronger foundation for your faith but be empowered as a "guardian of the way"—a confident, humble witness in a searching world.

Part 1: Reviewing the Journey – Synthesizing the Arguments into a Cohesive Case

To effectively give a reason for our hope, we must first synthesize the arguments we've studied into a cohesive, logical framework. This is like assembling a puzzle: each piece—from philosophy to history— fits together to reveal the big picture of Christianity's truth. Recall our cumulative approach: We began with Part I, the Foundation of Faith (Weeks 1-3), establishing God's existence through the Cosmological Argument (universe's beginning demands a Beginner), Teleological Argument (fine-tuning points to a Designer), and Moral Argument (objective morality requires a Moral Lawgiver). These aren't abstract;

they're grounded in observable reality, countering atheism's claim of a purposeless cosmos. As William Lane Craig notes, these form a "cumulative case" where each strengthens the others, with probabilities multiplying to near certainty.

Moving to Parts II & III, the Historical Bedrock (Weeks 4-9), we shifted from general theism to specific Christianity. Week 4's reliability of New Testament documents showed unparalleled manuscript evidence (24,000+ copies, short time gaps), surpassing classics like Homer. Week 5's eyewitness testimony, via the 1 Corinthians 15 creed (dated 3-5 years post-crucifixion), and Gospel biographies rooted in real accounts, affirmed authenticity. Weeks 6-9 unpacked Minimal Facts: Jesus's inescapable death (medical forensics of scourging/crucifixion), empty tomb (Jerusalem proclamation, enemy attestation, women's testimony), appearances (multiple attestations, to skeptics like Paul/James), and transformed lives (from fear to martyrdom). Gary Habermas's approach uses data accepted by 75-99% of scholars, building an inference to resurrection as best explanation—natural alternatives (hallucinations, theft) fail logically and psychologically.

Part IV's Corroborating Evidence (Weeks 10-11) added tangible support. Week 10's internal witness highlighted the Bible's statistical unity (40 authors, no contradictions), scarlet thread of prophecy (300+ fulfilled in Jesus, odds 1 in 10^157), and criterion of embarrassment (unflattering details like disciples' failures). Week 11's archaeology/forensics unearthed confirmations: Old Testament (Tel Dan Stele for David, Hezekiah's tunnel), New Testament (Pilate inscription, Bethesda Pool), and artifacts like the Shroud (3D image, pollen from Jerusalem) and Sudarium (blood matches Shroud, John 20:7). These "stones cry out, " as in Habakkuk 2:11, affirming Scripture's historicity.

Synthesizing: Start with God's existence (philosophy), then Christ's claims/death/resurrection (history), Bible's reliability (internal), and external validations (archaeology). This forms a "web of belief" where strands interweave—e.g., prophecies fulfill in historical events confirmed by digs. Practically, use analogies: Philosophy as foundation, history as structure, corroboration as reinforcement. In conversations, adapt: For atheists, start with cosmology; for history buffs, Minimal Facts. This synthesis isn't rigid but flexible, like Paul's Mars Hill address (Acts 17:22-31), quoting poets while pointing to resurrection. As we craft stories, remember: Evidence supports testimony, making our hope reasonable and relatable.

Part 2: Crafting Your Personal Apologetic Story – Blending Evidence and Experience

Now, we translate knowledge into personal wisdom by crafting your "Personal Apologetic Testimony"

(PAT)—a narrative blending your life story with course arguments. Effective testimonies, as per evangelism experts like Bill Fay ("Share Jesus Without Fear"), are concise (3-5 minutes), focused on Christ, and relational. From our searches, key principles include: Structure around before-Christ, howyou-met-Christ, after-Christ (Paul's model in Acts 26); be honest without glorifying sin; welcome questions for dialogue. Synthesize apologetics by weaving evidence naturally—don't lecture, illustrate.

Step 1: Reflect on Your Journey. Outline life pre-faith (struggles, doubts, e.g., moral relativism challenging the Moral Argument), encounter with Christ (perhaps through historical evidence like the empty tomb convincing you), and transformation (boldness from unity of Scripture). Tie to course: "Like the Cosmological Argument showed a Beginner, God began a new chapter in me. "

Step 2: Incorporate Arguments Organically. Use 1-2 key points per section. Pre-faith: "I wondered why the universe exists, echoing Week 1's question. " Conversion: "Studying the resurrection's Minimal Facts— death, tomb, appearances, transformations—mirrored my change. " Post-faith: "The Bible's prophetic thread, like Isaiah 53 foretelling Jesus's suffering, assures my hope. " Keep it personal—e.g., "The Shroud's image reminded me of Christ's wounds for my sins. "

Step 3: Make It Relational and Concise. From Cru resources, use "bridge illustration" (sin's gap, Christ's cross). Avoid jargon; storytell: "I was like the doubting Thomas until evidence convinced me. " Practice:

Time yourself, refine for flow.

Step 4: End with Invitation. Close inviting response: "What's your reason for hope?" This PAT becomes your tool, adaptable for friends, coworkers, or online (@warriorkeoki—perhaps share digitally from Trinity, Florida).

Examples: Billy Graham's testimony wove personal revival with scriptural authority; C.S. Lewis integrated philosophy (Moral Argument influenced his conversion) into "Surprised by Joy. " Your story, infused with apologetics, becomes powerful—evidence makes it credible, experience relatable.

Part 3: Practical Tips for Sharing with Gentleness and Respect – From Knowledge to Conversation

Knowledge alone isn't enough; we must share with Peter's mandated gentleness and respect. Practical tips, drawn from resources like "The God Conversation" by J.P . Moreland, emphasize relational apologetics—listen first, argue last.

Tip 1: Build Relationships. From "I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist, " start with care: Ask about their story, values. In Florida's diverse communities, relate to local contexts—e.g., nature's design (Teleological Argument) amid beaches.

Tip 2: Listen Actively. Effective sharing involves questions: "What do you believe about God?" Per "Tactics" by Greg Koukl, use "Columbo" method—gentle queries like "What do you mean?" to understand objections.

Tip 3: Share Naturally. Integrate PAT in conversations: At work, "My hope comes from historical facts like the resurrection—want to hear?" Use visuals—Shroud image sparks discussion.

Tip 4: Be Prepared Yet Humble. Role-play: Practice synthesizing (e.g., 2-minute Minimal Facts summary).

Admit limits: "I don't know everything, but let's explore together. " Gentleness means empathy—respect differing views while standing firm.

Tip 5: Follow Up. Pray, invite to church or study. Resources like Alpha Course facilitate.

This practical application turns commission into lifestyle, as in Matthew 28:19-20.

Part 4: Addressing Common Objections – Gentle Responses Rooted in Our Case

Encounters often bring objections; respond gently, using our synthesis. From searches, common ones include:

Objection 1: "Christians are hypocrites. " Response: Acknowledge flaws (criterion of embarrassment shows Bible's honesty about failures like Peter's denial). "True Christianity is about Christ's perfection, not ours. Like the disciples' transformation, God changes lives—here's my story. "

Objection 2: "Christianity is a crutch for the weak. " Response: "It's strength in admitting need (Moral Argument shows objective right/wrong we can't meet). Historical facts like resurrection aren't emotional;

they're evidence-based. What's your hope's foundation?"

Objection 3: "All religions lead to God—why Jesus only?" Response: "Respectfully, Jesus claimed exclusivity (John 14:6). Prophecies (scarlet thread) and resurrection Minimal Facts distinguish Christianity. Archaeology confirms unique historicity. "

Objection 4: "Science disproves God/Bible. " Response: "Actually, cosmology (Big Bang) supports a Beginner; archaeology vindicates Scripture (e.g., Pilate stone). Forensics like Shroud challenge naturalism. "

Objection 5: "Too much evil—where's God?" Response: "Evil affirms Moral Argument—objective wrong implies Lawgiver. Jesus's suffering (Sudarium/Shroud evidence) shows God enters our pain, offering hope through resurrection. "

Objection 6: "Bible full of contradictions. " Response: "Unity across authors defies odds; 'contradictions' resolve with context (e.g., Gospel perspectives complement). Dead Sea Scrolls show transmission accuracy. "

Objection 7: "Christianity causes violence (Crusades, etc.). " Response: "True followers emulate Christ's love; abuses contradict teachings. Compare to atheism's 20th-century atrocities—issue is human sin, solved by Gospel. "

Objection 8: "It's just mythology. " Response: "Eyewitness testimony (1 Corinthians 15 creed), archaeology (Hezekiah's tunnel), forensics distinguish from myths. "

Objection 9: "Good people don't need Jesus. " Response: "Moral Argument shows all fall short (Romans 3:23). Transformation stories show grace's power. "

Objection 10: "Homophobic/transphobic. " Response: "Bible calls for love (Matthew 22:39); disagree on behavior but affirm dignity. Personal story: God's love changed me without compromising truth. "

Respond with questions: "What specifically concerns you?" This keeps dialogue open, as in Proverbs 15:1: "A gentle answer turns away wrath. "

In conclusion, this commission empowers us to live as ambassadors (2 Corinthians 5:20), synthesizing knowledge into wisdom. Your PAT is your tool—share it boldly yet humbly. As guardians of the way, let's go forth, for the world searches for answers we hold.

Extra Notes & Resources for Deeper Study

This final week's emphasis on commissioning turns apologetics into action, blending evidence with personal testimony. For deeper exploration in sharing your faith, consider these resources and key figures.

Key Thinkers to Know:

• William Lane Craig (1949-Present): Philosopher and apologist; his "Reasonable Faith" ministry teaches synthesizing arguments into personal defenses, with a focus on gentle engagement.

• Greg Koukl (1950-Present): Founder of Stand to Reason; expert in conversational tactics, emphasizing questions and respect in apologetics.

• Lee Strobel (1952-Present): Former atheist journalist; his investigative style in "The Case for Christ" models blending personal story with evidence.

• Ravi Zacharias (1946-2020): Global apologist; stressed cultural sensitivity and addressing objections with wisdom and humility.

Online Resources

• ReasonableFaith.org: William Lane Craig's site with tools for crafting testimonies and Q&A videos.

• STR.org (Stand to Reason): Greg Koukl's resources, including podcasts on handling objections gently.

• RZIM.org (Ravi Zacharias International Ministries): Archives on cultural apologetics and personal stories.

Discussion Questions

1. Looking back at the entire course, which argument or evidence (e.g., the Minimal Facts or the Shroud) most strengthened your personal faith, and how will you incorporate it into your apologetic story?

2. Why is blending your personal testimony with apologetic evidence important? Share an example from your life where an argument could enhance your story.

3. In Part 3, we discussed practical tips like active listening—how can asking questions rather than arguing help in sharing your faith with respect?

4. Choose one common objection from Part 4 (e.g., "Too much evil in the world"). How would you respond gently, using elements from the course?

5. As we conclude, how has this series equipped you to be an "ambassador for Christ"? What one step will you take this week to share your reason for hope?

Further Study Worksheet: "Addressing the Problem of Evil"

One of the most common objections to Christianity is the problem of evil: "If God is good and powerful, why does suffering exist?" This worksheet helps you craft a response rooted in the course's teachings.

Key Elements of a Response:

• Acknowledge the Question: Evil is real and painful—Bible doesn't minimize it (e.g., Job's suffering, Jesus's crucifixion).

• Moral Argument Tie-In: Evil's existence presupposes objective morality, pointing to a Moral Lawgiver (Week 3). Without God, "evil" is subjective.

• Free Will Defense: From the Cosmological and Moral Arguments, God created free beings; love requires choice, enabling evil (Genesis 3's fall).

• Redemptive Purpose: Scarlet thread shows God uses suffering for good (Romans 8:28)—Jesus's death/resurrection (Minimal Facts) defeats evil.

• Eternal Perspective: Archaeology/forensics show temporal suffering; resurrection hope promises justice (Revelation 21:4).

Historical Example: The Shroud/Sudarium evidence of Christ's torture reminds us God entered suffering, not causing but redeeming it.

Reflection Questions for Study:

1. How does the problem of evil personally challenge you? Use the Moral Argument to reframe it.

2. Practice a 1-minute response: Incorporate free will and redemption—how does Jesus's resurrection answer suffering?

3. In a conversation, how would you listen empathetically before responding? Role-play with a group member.

Supplemental Study for Week 12

A biblical blueprint for the commission is Paul's Mars Hill address (Acts 17:16-34), modeling gentle, reasoned sharing.

Key Aspects:

• Observation and Engagement: Paul observed Athens's idols, starting with common ground—"I see you are very religious" (v.22)—respecting culture while pointing to truth.

• Synthesis of Arguments: He used cosmology (God as Creator, v.24), teleology (sustains all, v.25), and moral sense (judgment coming, v.31), tying to resurrection.

• Personal Invitation: Quoted Greek poets (v.28) for relatability, then called to repentance (v.30).

• Gentle Response: Faced mockery but persisted, winning converts like Dionysius.

Implications: Like our PAT, Paul's approach was contextual, evidence-based, and humble. In modern settings (e.g., online or workplace), observe worldviews, synthesize course arguments, and invite dialogue. This model unifies knowledge with mission, commissioning us as Paul was.

Crafting Your 1-Minute Apologetic

The goal of apologetics is not just to know the evidence, but to be able to share it in a personal and relational way. One of the most effective ways to do this is to weave the reasons for your faith into your personal testimony. This exercise will help you craft a concise, one-minute story that you can share in a natural conversation.

Structure your story in three parts: Before, The Turning Point, and After. Below are a few examples from different life perspectives.

Example 1: The University Student

• Before: "In my philosophy class, it felt like every argument was designed to tear down faith. I started to think that being a Christian meant ignoring science and history, and I honestly wasn't sure my beliefs could stand up to that kind of scrutiny. "

• The Turning Point: "But then I was challenged to look into the actual historical evidence for the resurrection. I was shocked to learn that the core of the story is supported by facts that most historians—even non-Christian ones—accept. Learning that the disciples' belief in the resurrection can be dated to within just a few years of the cross showed me it wasn't a latedeveloping legend. "

• After: "Knowing my faith is rooted in a real, historical event gives me a quiet confidence in those classroom discussions. It's not about winning debates, but about knowing that my hope isn't just a feeling; it's grounded in a reality that changes everything. "

Example 2: The Parent

• Before: "When my kids started asking really tough questions about God and the Bible, I realized my answers were pretty shallow. I'd say 'you just have to have faith, ' but I knew that wasn't a satisfying answer for them, or even for me. "

• The Turning Point: "That's when I started looking into the evidence for myself. The moral argument really hit home for me. I realized that our deep, innate sense of right and wrong, which I'm trying to teach my kids, doesn't make sense without a real, transcendent standard of goodness—which is God's own character. "

• After: "Now, our conversations are different. I can tell my kids that we believe in God not just because the Bible says so, but because the world He made and the moral compass He put inside us both point to Him. It's helped us build a faith for our family that is for both the heart and the mind. "

Example 3: The Professional in a Secular Workplace

• Before: "In my line of work, faith is seen as a purely private, emotional thing. I always felt like I had to check my faith at the door because I didn't have a logical way to talk about it with my skeptical colleagues. "

• The Turning Point: "Someone introduced me to the fine-tuning argument—the idea that the fundamental constants of the universe are exquisitely balanced for life to exist. As an engineer, the sheer improbability of that happening by chance was staggering. It made me realize that believing in a Designer was actually a more rational explanation than believing in a cosmic accident. "

• After: "I'm still not loud about my faith at work, but I'm no longer afraid of the topic coming up. I have a newfound confidence that my worldview is coherent and evidence-based. It allows me to engage in respectful conversations, knowing that faith in a Creator is a reasonable and intellectually sound position. "

Example 4: The Friend in Crisis

• Before: "For a long time, my faith felt like it was mostly for when things were going well. When a close friend went through a real tragedy, I realized I didn't have a good answer for why we can have hope when life seems meaningless and chaotic. "

• The Turning Point: "I started studying the historical evidence for Jesus's resurrection. The fact that the disciples went from being terrified and hiding to being willing to die for their belief that they had seen the risen Jesus really struck me. Their transformation wasn't based on a nice idea, but on a powerful, world-changing event. "

• After: "Now I understand that Christian hope isn't just wishful thinking. It's grounded in the historical fact that Jesus conquered death. That means that even in the worst suffering, death doesn't get the final word. That's a real, tangible hope I can share with my friends when they're hurting. "

Take some time this week to write out your own one-minute story. Practice saying it out loud so it sounds natural. The goal is not to have a rigid script, but to have a clear, concise, and personal way to give a reason for the hope that is in you.